After two years of painfully detailed research through
thousands of documents, the Hrant Dink Foundation in Istanbul has produced a
monumental work on the history and present status of the properties that once
belonged to the Armenian charitable foundations in Istanbul—properties that
were all seized by the Turkish government during the last few decades. The
comprehensive study, some 400 pages long, for the first time compiles a list of
the seized properties, illustrating the overall picture and enormity of the
plunder suffered by the Armenian schools, orphanages, churches, and hospitals
in Istanbul that were dependent on the property income for survival.
Map 1
The book’s title, 2012 Declaration, is a reference to the
Turkish state’s 1936 Declaration ordering all minority charitable foundations
to list their assets and properties. During the height of the Cyprus crisis in
1975, the state arbitrarily legislated that any properties that were obtained
by minority charitable foundations after 1936 through donations, inheritance,
wills, and gifts, were deemed illegal, since they had not been listed in the
1936 Declaration. 2012 Declaration makes reference to this illogical
legislation and exposes the legalized but unlawful seizure, or state robbery,
that took place years ago, and the recent small steps taken to undo the gross
injustice.
The book is not a mere historical document providing an
inventory of physical properties, or statistical records and legal statements.
Rather, it is a story of enormous human suffering, ranging from children being
thrown out of their schools, to orphans no longer being able to find a home;
the most tragic story involves the seizure of a summer camp complex of
buildings literally constructed by orphan children (including Hrant Dink himself)
by the Turkish state, to be sold to Turkish individuals.
The four members of the Hrant Dink Foundation—Mehmet
Polatel, Nora Mildanoglu, Ozgur Leman Eren, and Mehmet Atilgan—sifted through
the patriarchate, church, and school archives, government deeds and title
records, foundation lawyers’ personal archives, old maps and surveys, purchase
and sale agreements, and Hrant Dink’s own research files, to produce this
concise history of each charitable foundation, including the location and type
of properties gifted to each foundation and then seized by the state, and more
than 200 photographs. The most heart-breaking aspect of this historic document
are surely the photographs, some of which are reprinted here. The research
team’s attempts to obtain documents from government offices, however, were
mostly unsuccessful, even though they were equipped with the force of
legislation called the Freedom of Information Act; they were told that the
1915-25 era deed and title records of the Armenians are still not open to the
public, due to the official paranoia that exists, defined as “threats to state
security.”
This article will attempt to summarize the 400-page
document and give some striking examples of Istanbul-Armenian history.
***
First, some excerpts from book’s Introduction Section:
“This book is not the story of seized buildings made of stone or cement, but
the story of flesh-and-bone human beings. These seized institutions and
buildings were the cherished belongings of human beings rich and poor, young and
old, men and women, who had worked hard to create or acquire them. These
unjustly seized buildings gave life to the schools, churches, orphanages, and
retirement homes of the whole community. The social and cultural fabric of the
Turkish-Armenians depended on this economic foundation. It is our wish that
similar injustices will not be carried into the future, as people read in this
book the documented ‘why’ and ‘how’ of the attempts to wipe out the life and
culture of our community. The issue is not only the seizure or return of the
properties, but understanding this dimension of history and passing it on to
future generations. As long as the ancestral people of these lands are
marginalized or defined as ‘others,’ as long as minorities are not seen as equal
citizens, the democratization efforts in Turkey will be stunted. It is our wish
that this study will contribute to facing history.”
The book then lists the Armenian charitable foundations
and their assets. There were 53 Armenian charitable foundations in Istanbul,
administering 18 schools and orphanages, 48 churches, 2 hospitals, and 20
cemeteries of the Istanbul-Armenian community, supported by the rental revenue
and assets that they owned or received through wills and gifts. These
foundations owned 1,328 properties, of which 661 were seized by the state for
several reasons. The study could not determine the fate of 87 properties. After
exhausting all legal means available to get back the seized properties from the
state through the Turkish courts, over the last 10 years some of the
foundations have taken their cases to the European Human Rights Court. As they
began to win all of their cases, and since the European court decisions were
binding on Turkey through European Union accession expectations, the Turkish
state recently decided to amend the 1975 legislation related to the foundations
(which had enabled their legal but unlawful seizure). With an improved piece of
legislation, 143 properties, or about 10.77 percent of the 1,328 properties,
have now been returned to the Armenian foundations.
Map 2
The types of seized properties were residential apartment
buildings, residential apartment units, house dwellings, vacant lots, orchards,
fountains, stores/shops, warehouses, factories, commercial buildings, office
buildings, office units, hospitals, workplaces, summer camps, churches,
schools, and cemeteries.
The “owner status” of the seized properties are listed as
unknown, municipal government, state treasury, public building, vacant, lost
deed/title, individually owned, owned by other foundation, or owned by the
State General Directorate of Foundations.
The process by which the foundation obtained properties
is listed as follows: donation, will, purchase, by Ottoman Sultan decree. The
process by which the foundation lost properties is listed as follows: seizure
by state, made public by state, sale to individuals or corporations.
The book explains some of the stories of seizure in great
detail. Some examples are provided below.
Mkhitaryan Bomonti School
This is the tragic story of a 200-year-old Armenian
school that ended up being a tenant in the building it used to own.
Nevertheless, it is a story with a happy ending.
The Armenian Catholic Venice Mkhitarists founded a boys’
school in 1830 in the Pera neighborhood. In order to serve the increased
student population in better educational facilities, the school foundation
decided to move the school to a larger building, and in 1958, purchased the
present site at Sisli-Bomonti neighborhood for 710,000 Turkish liras from a
woman named Emine Tevfika Ayasli. The school name was changed to the Private
Bomonti Armenian Catholic Primary School. In 1979, the State Charitable
Foundations Directorate started a court case against the Armenian school; since
this school was not listed in the 1936 Declaration, they argued, the purchase
of the new school building was illegal. The directorate demanded that the
purchase be cancelled and the building returned to the seller, or the heirs of
the seller. The court accepted the argument, and in 1988 the Appeal Court
turned down the Armenians’ appeal. The school building deed was turned over to
the former owner, who was deceased; as per the directions of her will, it was
deeded to her brothers and to the Ankara Ayas Municipality. (It is interesting
to note that Ayasli’s will was prepared years after the school building was
legally sold to the Armenian school foundation.) The brothers sold their share
of the building to a construction company specialized in apartment buildings,
named Miltas. In 1998, the Ankara Ayas Municipality entered into a tenancy
agreement with the school and started charging rent. But the other owner,
Miltas, objected to the tenancy agreement and started court proceedings to have
the school vacate the building. In February 1999, Miltas won the case, and the
same day the school’s contents (including students’ desks, library shelves and
books, kindergarden toys and the school piano) were moved outside into the
school yard. Faced with an incredible situation of suddenly having no school in
the middle of the winter, the Armenian parents, in an exceptional fashion,
resorted to civil disobedience, and start camping out in the school yard. The
public outcry forced the mayor of the Istanbul Sisli Municipality to intervene,
and he arranged to buy the shares of Miltas, the construction company. He also
struck an agreement with the Ayas Municipality to have the school continue to
function by paying rent to the Ayas Municipality. Naturally, the school lost
most of its students after these disturbances and the student population
dropped to 35. Meanwhile, the school foundation went to court to re-claim the
building. In November 2012, two days before the publication of this book, the
court case ended with victory for the Armenian school and now, the deeds have
finally been returned to the Armenian foundation and the school has stopped
paying rent.
Tuzla Armenian Children’s Camp
In the 1950’s, the Armenian Protestant Church in the
Gedikpasa neighborhood of Istanbul served as the arrival point for many poor
and homeless Armenian orphans, especially from Anatolian settlements. These
children, numbering in the 60s, received their education at the Gedikpasa
Armenian Protestant School in the winter under tolerable conditions, but had
nowhere to go during the summers. The church foundation decided to purchase a
vacant treed lot near the Marmara Sea in the Tuzla municipality for a summer
camp for these children. In October 1962, the purchase was completed from an
individual named Sait Durmaz, and registered in the church title, according to
all applicable legal procedures. From then on, every summer, the children, aged
8-12, were given the task of building camp buildings, supervised by a builder
named Tuzlali Hasan Kalfa. The children first erected the poles and the canvas
tents they would live in during construction. Then they dug a water well,
taking turns pumping the water needed for construction. Then the foundations
were prepared. Since the sea was only 500 meters away, they carried all the
sand and gravel from the beach by wheelbarrows. Slowly but surely, over three
summers, the vacant land was transformed into a summer camp complex with
buildings, dormitories, dining halls, play areas, a soccer field, pond, and
gym. The children stocked the pond with frogs and ducks. Armenian boys and
girls learned how to talk, sing, play, cook, and clean together in Armenian.
Hrant Dink was one of those boys; his wife Rakel was one of those girls.
Happy days came to an end when the State Charitable
Foundations Directorate applied to the courts in February 1979, to reverse the
purchase agreement and have the property returned to its previous owner,
arguing that the Gedikpasa Church Foundation had no right to purchase the property.
After four years of trials, the court cancelled the summer camp deed and
returned the property to its former owner, Sait Durmaz, including the
extraordinary facilities that the children had constructed. The camp, imprinted
in the memory of 1,500 Armenian children, became abandoned, with rusting bed
frames, broken windows, and overgrown weeds. In 1987, the Appeal Court approved
the previous court decision. The owner sold the camp to new purchasers, who in
turn sold it again. Several court applications by the Armenian foundation in
the 2000’s, and most recently in August 2011, were all turned down. One of
Hrant’s last articles titled “Humanity, I take you to court!…” was a solemn cry
in the face of this gross injustice.
Kalfayan Orphanage
In 1865, a cholera epidemic in Istanbul left many
children behind as poor orphans. An Armenian nun named Srpuhi Nshan Kalfayan
decided to care of 17 orphan girls, aged 2-10, at her home. She also started
teaching them handcrafts and sewing. These personal efforts led to the founding
of one of the most important Armenian educational institutions in Istanbul, the
Kalfayan Orphanage School. The orphanage survived until the late 1960’s, when
the school building was expropriated without compensation and demolished, in order
to build the expressways leading to the Bosphorus Bridge crossing between
Europe and Asia. The foundation owned a large parcel of land where it planned
to transfer the orphanage school. The State Charitable Foundations Directorate
argued that since this land was not registered in the 1936 Declaration,
building a new orphanage there could not be allowed, and that the orphans and
their teachers should be redistributed to other orphanages. Repeated
applications did not yield any results and 150 people, the combined total of
orphans and staff, spent the next 30 years in various dilapidated buildings,
until a new arrangement was made in 1999 to share the school building of the
Semerciyan School in Uskudar.
***
In a previous article in the Armenian Weekly, dated Aug.
31, 2011, and titled, “Special Report: What is Turkey Returning to the
Armenians?” I referred to another significant state seizure of Armenian
properties. The Surp Agop Cemetery lands, which was decreed by Ottoman Sultan
Suleiman to the Armenian community in 1550 as a reward to his Armenian cook,
Manuk Karaseferyan of Van, who had uncovered a plot to poison the emperor by
German spies during the siege of Budapest. The cemetery was used for 400 years
until the 1930’s, when the Istanbul municipality expropriated the lands after
years of legal wrangling. At present, these lands, which have become one of the
most valuable and fashionable districts of Istanbul, are occupied by the State
Radio and Television Headquarters, the Turkish Armed Forces Istanbul
Headquarters, the Military Museum, many expensive hotels such as Hilton,
Regency Hyatt, Divan, and several apartment and office buildings, as well as
the expansive Taksim Park, which has some walkways made from marble of the
Armenian tombstones.
The 2012 Declaration book documents the Armenian
properties lost in Istanbul, mainly during the 1970’s, with the illogical but
legal argument that if the charitable foundations had obtained properties after
1936, they would be deemed illegal because they had not been included in the
1936 Declaration. But the extent of this gross injustice would pale in
comparison when we consider the amount of seized or lost Armenian properties
after 1915, not only in Istanbul, but all over Anatolia, especially in historic
Armenia. To illustrate the sheer enormity of the loss, consider these numbers:
There were more than 4000 Armenian churches and schools in Anatolia, each with
its own land, each with its own income generating additional lands, properties,
and assets. The recently reconstructed Surp Giragos Church in Diyarbakir had
over 200 separate deeds and titles to different properties such as shops,
houses, farms, and orchards, which were taken over by the government and
private individuals, erecting apartment buildings, office buildings, state
schools, shops and houses, even a highway. Thankfully, the process to take
these properties back has already started in Diyarbakir. The above-mentioned
figures are only for Armenian churches and schools, that is, community owned
buildings. Add to those numbers the properties owned by private Armenian
individuals, such as houses, shops, farms, orchards, factories, warehouses,
mines, and so on, and it becomes quite difficult to grasp the enormity of this
wealth transfer.
No wonder there is resistance in facing history or
acknowledging the facts.
About author
Raffi Bedrosyan
Raffi Bedrosyan is a civil engineer as well as a concert
pianist, living in Toronto, Canada. For the past several years, proceeds from
his concerts and two CDs have been donated to the construction of school,
highway, water, and gas distribution projects in Armenia and Karabagh—projects
in which he has also participated as a voluntary engineer. Bedrosyan was
involved in organizing the Surp Giragos Diyarbakir/Dikranagerd Church
reconstruction project, and in promoting the significance of this historic
project worldwide as the first Armenian reclaim of church properties in
Anatolia after 1915. In September 2012, he gave the first Armenian piano
concert in the Surp Giragos Church since 1915.
http://www.armenianweekly.com/2012/12/06/2012-declaration-a-history-of-seized-armenian-properties-in-istanbul/


1 yorum:
This is only a part of the Armenian history in Constantinople-Istanbul but how about in the Historic Armenia-Anatolia where thousands of churches,schools,monasteries,homes,properties and savings were all forcefully taken away from Armenians?
And we have got news for everyone,those properties which were taken away from Armenians were not the only ones which were taken away from the original Anatolian residents,,We can add the Christian Greeks,ChristianAssyrian and Jews in Adrianapolis-Edirne,Canakkale ,Istanbul as well where they also had to pay their shares to the opressing Turkish government in the mid 1930's till late 1990's.
There is no way to justify all these properties forcefully being taken away from non Muslim Christian and Jewish communities in the modern Turkish republic's history and there is more,,as if that unjustified tax collection was not enough in the 1940's ,all the male population among those who could not pay the unbelievable enormous taxes ,they were sent to the camps in the Eastern Anatolia to work in the railroads,in the rock mines ect and many souls were lost by not being able to continue to do the required job from them for free as if they were slaves.
Then once it was over by the end of world war II,Turkey declared Democracy but that Democracy also brought harms to Istanbul's Greek,Armenian Communities with the mid 1950's Sep 6,7 Pogroms.The Greek population once counted almost 200 thousand souls nowdays shrank down to only 1500 souls,Armenian and jewish communities shrunk as well due to the way Turkey was treating them.
Yes we all pay taxes,yes we are all Turkish citizens and serve to the military as any other Turkish citizens only with one exception,,we can't be an officer or a simple Government employee just because we are not Turks.
There is much to say about how Ankara saw non Turks in Turkey and still would continue to see the same way if EU did not have it's standart requirements to meet to join to the union.
Also nowdays there is a Huge Turkish community in EU countries counting with millions of souls and they have all the equal rights as anyone else in those countries and have the rights to practice their religion and culture freely while there is still discremeinations against non Turks in Turkey.
Turkey still has a long ways to go in order to fix it's mistakes in it's past.
Yorum Gönder
Not: Yalnızca bu blogun üyesi yorum gönderebilir.