Seçil Yılmaz, The Graduate Center of the City University
of New York
The nineteenth century was a time of rising literacy and
language reform. Beyond intellectual debates about the expansion of public
education, language became a fundamental component of nationalist, imperial and
religious ideologies. It also largely shaped the formation of discourses about
citizenship at the time. Although these developments largely constrained
language and discouraged multilingualism, other factors encouraged it. Learning
to read had been the primary requirement of a respectable citizenship status,
and proficiency in a lingua franca, namely the French language in
nineteenth-century Ottoman society, presented countless advantages and
opportunities whether in the job market, the realm of politics or while filling
out the immigration form at a foreign consulate.
As Benjamin Fortna suggests in
Learning to Read in the Late Ottoman Empire and Early Turkish Republic, putting
Ottoman/Turkish language reform experience into global perspective, for example
by looking at Russian and Chinese experiences at the time, would help exploring
various implications of the efforts in raising the literacy and its relation to
practices of modernity in multi-linguistic societies at the turn of the
twentieth century. (Fortna, Learning to Read, pp. 11-12)
Osmanlıca Bilenlere Dört Günde Ermenice Okumanın Usulü
(1892)
While various ideologies sought to define and theorize
the language of the nation during the long nineteenth century, the multi-ethnic
and multi-linguistic social composition of the Ottoman Empire complicated and
enriched the conditions of co-existence of different languages on the same
street, on the same petition and in the same daily newspaper. In Ottoman
society, everyday life accommodated and required access to various languages
including but not limited to Turkish, Greek, Arabic, Armenian, Ladino and
Kurdish. As the Ottoman administration became more involved in the provinces,
officials and civil servants were increasingly expected to speak multiple
languages. Meanwhile, vernacularization and the rise of print increased the
types of interaction and exchanges between Ottoman languages. Novels published
in Armeno-Turkish and Karamanlidika or newspapers offering multiple languages
side by side represent common examples of interaction, exchange, and hybridization
between the languages commonly spoken in Ottoman society.
One major barrier to accessing such publications was the
ignorance of different alphabets and the basics of grammar. Hacı Bey Zade Ahmet
Muhtar’s book entitled Osmanlıca Bilenlere Dört Günde Ermenice Okumanın Usulü
(How to Read Armenian in 4 Days for Ottoman Speakers) serves as a good example
of a means of overcoming the difficulties of learning to read Armeno-Turkish
using the “teach yourself” method. In the preface, Hacı Bey Zade Ahmet Muhtar
explains that his motivation in preparing such a book was to provide a guide
that would enable Ottoman-Turkish readers to have access to newspapers, weekly
magazines and novels published in (Ottoman-)Turkish with Armenian letters
(Türkçe ibarenin Ermenice harfleriyle yazılıp ve neşr olunan). Hacı Bey Zade
Ahmet Muhtar also considers this book as a guide for Turkish-speaking Armenians
who wish to refine their own language. Hacı Bey Zade Ahmet Muhtar defines the
book (licensed by the Ministry of Education on 18 Rebiülevvel 1310 [10 October
1892]) as an “easy way” to become proficient in reading Armenian letters. He
stresses, however, that only strict adherence to his tried and true method will
make this possible. Readers are instructed to follow the lessons in order and
not skip to the following lesson without studying the previous one properly.
Darerk Osmanyan Lezvii (1884)
A quick look at the materials will reveal that the
Armenian alphabet matches up surprisingly well with Ottoman. Thus, it is no wonder
that various reformists throughout the late Ottoman period suggested Armenian
as opposed to the Latin spellings would provide the best basis for a new
Turkish alphabet. Hacı Bey Zade Ahmet Muhtar’s book, now over 100 years old,
offers a new possibility and a challenge for Ottoman Turkish readers to teach
themselves how to read Armeno-Turkish in 4 days. For those up to the challenge,
we've provided a complete PDF of Osmanlıca Bilenlere Dört Günde Ermenice
Okumanın Usulü digitized by Marmara University and İSAM.
Just as the political climate of the late Ottoman period
encouraged Turkish speakers to begin learning other languages and alphabets
such as Armenian, Ottoman Istanbul was also a popular destination for
intellectuals and professionals from abroad, especially Armenians, many of whom
could not read Ottoman Turkish. For those purposes, works such as this one from
1884 explaining Ottoman Turkish grammar and orthography were also common.
http://www.docblog.ottomanhistorypodcast.com/2014/08/ottoman-armenian-alphabet-armeno-turkish.html

1 yorum:
According to Prof. Elif Shafak Ottoman Turkish is the most versitile language. There are many ways to express ideas, thoughts in a succint way. Personally I think the present Turkish is getting more artificial as the years go . Who knows where those new Turkish words come from? One could not find many words used today in the 1960s. Just check out HUrriyet, Cumhuriyet, newswpapers full of new words, which seems to be created out of blue. Thus, Turkish is becoming an artifcial language. It would be interesting to investigate the etimology of these words
Yorum Gönder
Not: Yalnızca bu blogun üyesi yorum gönderebilir.