By Rick Gladstone
Pope Francis’ description of the killing of Armenians 100
years ago as a genocide has caused a diplomatic uproar with Turkey and elevated
resilient historical arguments about what really happened. The arguments are
likely to intensify as Armenia prepares to officially commemorate the event in
less than two weeks. Here are some questions raised by the pope’s statement,
made during his Sunday Mass, and by the response from Turkey, which condemned
his remarks as “baseless” and recalled its ambassador from the Vatican.
Q. What does genocide mean and what is its origin?
A. Genocide is generally defined as the deliberate
killing of people who belong to a particular racial, political or cultural
group, with the intent to destroy the existence of that group. The term did not
exist until 1944, when a Polish Jewish lawyer, Raphael Lemkin, combined the
Greek word for race or tribe, “geno,” with “-cide,” from the Latin word for
killing. According to the website of the United States Holocaust Memorial
Museum, (http://www.ushmm.org/confront-genocide/defining-genocide)
Mr. Lemkin created the term genocide to describe systematic killings conducted
by the Nazis. But Mr. Lemkin said he also had the killings of Armenians in
mind. In a 1949 CBS interview, (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf4JE3QTse0)
Mr. Lemkin told a commentator, Quincy Howe: “I became interested in genocide
because it happened so many times. It happened to the Armenians, and after the
Armenians, Hitler took action.” The term was incorporated into the 1948 United
Nations Convention on Genocide.
Q. What is the historical event at issue?
A. It refers to the breakup of the Ottoman Empire,
starting in 1915, when the Ottomans, who were aligned with Germany in World War
I, sought to prevent Armenians from collaborating with Russia and ordered mass
deportations from the empire’s eastern provinces. As many as 1.5 million ethnic
Armenians died from the combination of forced exodus, starvation and killings
by Ottoman Turk soldiers and the police. About 500,000 Armenians survived, and
many scattered into Russia, the United States and elsewhere in what became an
Armenian diaspora. Many historians now consider the deaths of the Armenians to
be the first genocide of the 20th century.
Q. Why is Turkey’s government so opposed to the use of
the term “genocide” to describe what happened?
A. Turkey’s government has acknowledged that atrocities
were committed during that period but has argued that a large number of Turks
were also killed, and that to portray the killing of Armenians as systematic
and intentional is historically inaccurate. Turkey’s government has disputed
the number of Armenians killed, suggesting that it was far lower than 1.5
million. The government may also be worried about the legal implications of a
genocide acknowledgment, with the possibility that it would be obliged to pay
reparations for deaths, suffering and the confiscation and destruction of
property. According to a report released in March by the Armenian Genocide
Reparations Study Group, a panel of legal and human rights experts, financed by
advocates for Armenia, that first convened in 2007, the amount of reparations
money would total in the many tens of billions of dollars.
Q. How many other countries have taken a position on this
question?
A. According to the website of the Armenian National
Council of America, legislatures in at least 15 countries, and the Council of
Europe and the European Parliament, have passed resolutions recognizing the
Armenian genocide. The United Nations Subcommission on Prevention of
Discrimination and Protection of Minorities has also described the period as
genocide. Some countries, including Switzerland and Greece, have called for
criminal charges against those who deny it.
Q. What is the position of the United States government
on use of the word “genocide” to describe what happened?
A. Successive administrations have sought to skirt this
question because of Turkey’s growing importance, both as a NATO ally and as an
influential political and economic power in the Middle East. They have also
described the use of the term genocide as harmful to efforts at
Turkish-Armenian reconciliation. When President Obama first campaigned for
president in 2008 he used the term genocide but has softened his description since
taking office, calling the period of history an atrocity and a dark chapter,
but resisting efforts by members of Congress to bring a resolution on the
question to a vote. Pope Francis’ use of the term genocide in his Sunday Mass
has raised speculation that Mr. Obama might do so as well.
Q. What special events are planned to commemorate the
centennial?
A. Prominent Armenians in the diaspora have already
started commemorating the 100th anniversary. Some have collaborated with
Hollywood celebrities to award a humanitarian prize, starting next year, in
honor of those who helped to save Armenians during that period. In Yerevan, the
capital of Armenia, the centennial will be officially remembered on April 24
and will be attended by a number of world leaders, including President Vladimir
V. Putin of Russia.
The Parliament of Armenia is also likely to adopt a
statement before the centennial remembrance calling on parliaments and
interparliamentary organizations around the world to recognize the Armenian
genocide.
Correction: April 14, 2015
An earlier version of this article referred incompletely
to the origins of the term genocide, which was created by Raphael Lemkin. While
systematic killings by the Nazis helped inspire the term, Mr. Lemkin said in a
1949 interview with CBS that he also had the 1915 killings of Armenians in
mind.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder
Not: Yalnızca bu blogun üyesi yorum gönderebilir.