Submitted by Giorgia Demarchi / Co-authors: Nora Dudwick
This refrain captures the common sentiment in Armenia,
and is at the heart of the growing issue of sex imbalances in the country.
Armenia today has one of the most imbalanced sex ratios at birth in the world,
with 114 baby boys born for every 100 baby girls, above the natural rate of
105. We recently met with groups across Armenia to dig deeper into the root
causes of sex preferences, with the hope of helping find an effective policy
solution.
This issue has long affected countries like China, India
and others in Asia, but it has emerged only recently in the South Caucasus. In
Armenia, the ratio of boy births to girl births started increasing in the
1990s, when economic disruption and the desire to have smaller families,
combined with the availability of sex detection technology, led many families
to choose sex selection in the quest to have a son. The result? A generation of
“missing girls,” as Amartya Sen first called this phenomenon.
We know that imbalanced sex ratios are symptomatic of
gender inequalities in society. Mention this link to people in Armenia, and the
most likely response will be “we love our children equally” or “girls and boys
are treated the same here.” We heard this from men and women across Armenia
during qualitative research for a study launched last year on the ‘missing
girls’.
Although Armenian girls have equal access to education
and even outnumber boys in tertiary education, the survey data from the
Caucasus Barometer points to widespread son preference – a root cause of the
skewed sex ratios we see. Over half of the respondents admitted that if they
could only have one child, they would prefer a son. As many as 71 percent of
people expressed this preference in rural areas, where traditional family
systems remain most intact.
The initial skepticism of focus group respondents towards
the numbers we presented is not surprising. Nevertheless, many admit that both
son preference and its consequences are actually visible around them. Many
interviewees acknowledged talking their daughters, daughters-in-law or wives
into termination if pregnant with second or third girl. And the evidence of the
ingrained preference for sons across Armenian communities is abundant, as
testified also by our fieldwork.
Do people really prefer sons? Why?
With our partners from the Armenia Caucasus Research
Resource Centre, we tried to get to the bottom of the question by talking to
men and women of different age groups across four communities in Armenia. What
did we learn?
Son preference has a strong, practical basis. Parents
expect their sons to provide financial support and care in old age, and help
them deal with a whole range of difficulties in day-to-day life.
Local customs prescribe that elderly parents live with a
son and his family, cared for by daughters-in-law. Although daughters-in-law
are less submissive nowadays, such customs still retain a strong hold. Despite
“gender-neutral” inheritance laws, the traditional practice of leaving the
family home, land, and business to sons still predominates. “Only one in a
thousand decides to leave something to the daughter,” we were told.
Why is that? Daughters tend to move out of the parental
home, as “they are brought up to serve someone else” – typically, their
husband’s family. The limitations on women’s ability to control their own lives
and earn a good salary, and the potential threat that “inappropriate” behavior
constitutes to family honor make them a greater liability to their parents. So
son preference, according to mothers, is due also to parents worrying about the
vulnerability of daughters: “A son is more likely to be happy than a girl.”
However, our research also revealed the strong symbolic
value of sons: they carry on the family name and protect their families’ social
position. “Having a son is an issue of pride,” we heard. Having a son affirms the father’s masculinity
in the eyes of his neighbors. And having a son helps a woman secure her
position in her husband’s household. Sons are also seen as protectors of their
sisters, as suggested by the Armenian proverb, “the sister said she had a brother;
the brother did not say he had a sister”.
An agenda for action: value your girls!
As Women’s Day approaches, we owe girls in Armenia and
throughout the world an equal chance.
The policy challenge is complex, as son preference and
consequent sex selection are the product of both personal and societal
pressures, as well as economic and cultural circumstances. But international
experiences already suggest effective ways to address this preference. ‘Medical
solutions’ tend to be ineffective: banning medical personnel from revealing the
sex of the child or preventing women from terminating pregnancies only increase
risks for women who would resort to illegal and dangerous means to achieve the
same end. The solution must be sought in
tackling the underlying reasons for son preference.
Many Armenians know the way. “Whatever is done, wherever
it commences, the core should be the same: increasing the importance of women’s
role,” suggests a young woman in Yerevan. Let’s give her and all young Armenian
girls a chance to be born and grow into valued professionals and leaders.
This research was funded by the Umbrella Facility for
Gender Equality (UFGE), a multi-donor trust fund managed by the World Bank
Group.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder
Not: Yalnızca bu blogun üyesi yorum gönderebilir.