By : Stefan Ihrig / Dr. Ihrig is an author and professor in
history at the University of Haifa.
Writing this is dangerous: Speaking out on the Armenian
Genocide means taking a huge risk. At the very least, it will be an exhausting
experience, getting harassed online, trolled, threatened, down-rated on Amazon
and publicly vilified. Until now, this was true mainly for individuals—academics,
artists and activists. Now, it seems to apply to Hollywood movies, too. The
Armenian Genocide remains one of the most controversial topics of 20th-century
history and, even after its centennial, there is little reason to believe that
controversy will come to an end and that some sort of consensus will come into
being any time soon. Quite the opposite. Just in the last weeks, Turkey left
the European Union’s cultural program in protest over a piece honoring the
victims of the genocide by the Dresden Symphonic Orchestra which was sponsored
by the program. Most recently, Turkey prevented a concert—again the very same
piece—at the German Consulate in Istanbul. And now, we are in the middle of the
next anti-Armenian campaign. This time its object is a Hollywood movie, The
Promise, an epic focusing on the Armenian Genocide, starring amongst others
Christian Bale. Yet, this time it might actually backfire and go another way.
(L-R) Actors Oscar Isaac, Charlotte Le Bon and Christian Bale attend the ‘The Promise’ premiere during the 2016 Toronto International Film Festival on September 11, 2016 in Toronto, Canada. (Photo by Kevin Winter/Getty Images)
All this has a long tradition. Eighty years ago the Turkish
government forced Hollywood to drop a movie project based on The Forty Days of
Musa Dagh, then a best-selling novel on the Armenian Genocide by
German-language author, Jew and outspoken Hitler opponent Franz Werfel. The
Forty Days of Musa Dagh, originally written as a warning against Hitler through
the prism of the Armenian Genocide, never saw the silver screen. Such a movie
could have also raised awareness of the fate of the Jews in Nazi Germany at the
time and later of the ongoing Holocaust. It could have shaped the “narrative”
of the struggle against Hitler. Many have since been interested to finally turn
the novel into a major production, most recently, for example, Mel Gibson and
Sylvester Stallone, but Turkish opposition and obstruction seemed
insurmountable.
Much seemed to have changed in the last years, especially in
the centennial last year. A whole barrage of new publications, academic and
non-academic, add to recent milestone publications by the great historians of
the Armenian Genocide, such as Raymond Kevorkian, Taner Akcam and Ronald Grigor
Suny. Academic conferences were held all over the world. It was not without
reason that, at all the conferences on the Armenian Genocide in Israel last
year—at the Open University, at the Hebrew University, or at the Van Leer Jerusalem
Institute—participants and organizers made a point to talk about past efforts
to put on a conference about the Armenian Genocide and how these had been
thwarted by intervention of the Turkish government. Israel was a prized
battleground in the conflict over acceptance and denial. Hollywood was and is
another.
And while a lot has changed, a lot has stayed the same. One
sure indicator is the lack of reviews these many new, well-written and
well-researched books that appeared last year have received in the mainstream
media outlets in the Western world. Furthermore, even a rudimentary survey of
last year’s press coverage of the centennial of the Armenian Genocide shows
that it were mainly authors of Armenian descent who spoke out for the Armenians
and their story. Despite a series of resolutions by various European national
parliament recognizing the Armenian Genocide, most of the public opinion-makers
remain silent. This applies not only to journalists but also, for example,
historians writing the big histories of the 20th century or World War I. It is
thus not surprising that the press coverage of The Promise betrays the fact
that the Armenian Genocide is still perceived as a “new” and relatively unknown
topic to the public at large.
The Turkish government has constructed a very solid and
relatively successful wall of enforced silence, blocking attempts not only to
acknowledge, but even to discuss the topic through various forms of
intimidation. Armenian Genocide denial must be counted as one of the most successful
lobbying campaigns of the last 100 years when it comes to influencing our
understanding of the past. Even if methods of intervention have changed,
Turkish denialism is not a thing of the past. It is less often direct
intervention by the government or the embassy, but rather a general atmosphere
of intimidation, fear and enforced silence. One can only imagine what the
threatened repercussions for media companies are—papers, networks and movie
distributors—but we know that they exist and are very real. What is also real
and tangible is the instant slandering, the bullying reflex of an amorphous
body of Turkish nationalists and denialists who will use social media to attack
people who speak out.
The Promise made it further than the past grand projects—mainly
because it was independently financed. It is one of the most expensive
independent movies ever. It has been actually made and seems to have made it.
Well, almost: It still has to take a crucial hurdle. It still lacks
distributors. And it is here that Turkish intimidation, threat of boycott and
retaliation strikes. The movie was screened in September at the Toronto
International Film Festival to rather small-sized audiences. Like any movie of
note, it has its IMDB entry ready where you can find all the information on the
movie and where people can rate the film from one star to ten. And here this
movie, for all intents and purposes is not yet available to the public, has
become something of an online sensation, or rather an online battlefield. Over
the last weeks it has attracted over 91,000 votes, largely split between ten-
and one-star votes. The majority, over 57,000, are one-star votes. This is an
obvious campaign to down rate the movie which then triggered pro-Armenian
voting. We are witnessing yet another anti-Armenian denialist campaign playing
out abroad, far away from Turkey, in open, democratic societies. While it is
not clear who is orchestrating the campaign, it has to be assumed that, as with
other campaigns, connections go back to the Turkish government and/or
nationalist groups.
This seems to be something new. Armenian Genocide denialism
has gone through various phases of development in the last decades. It has now
fully endorsed, it appears, post-modern lingo, and often one finds pieces talking
simply about “stories” and “discourses” where in the past facts and archival
documents reigned supreme. If this was the post-modern turn of Armenian
Genocide denial, we are witnessing now the social media turn of the phenomenon.
Denialism has entered the age of Twitter and online mob-rule. And,
unfortunately, quite successfully so.
But what do over 91,000 votes on IMDB really tell us? Who
votes when, how many actual people are behind it, and thus how representative
is it? And for what exactly? Just as Trump’s presidential campaign can tell us
a lot about the future of politics—say, for example, about the role of online
bullying, social media message policy, and mobilizing hardcore supporters—so
the IMDB hype surrounding the The Promise can tell us something about highly
fragmented and mobilizable societies as well as, in many ways, radical groups
mainly existing as such groups only in the universe of social media (for now).
Until we understand this better and are more careful in falling into the traps
of social media polls, likes and reviews, more than 91,000 votes make for fine
advertisement and should help the movie secure good distribution so that we,
and all those over 32,000 who voted for it, can actually see the movie. Few
movies have ever experienced such a pre-release buzz on IMDB. That much is
clear. Thank you, denialists.

1 yorum:
Denial wins merely by being an equal party to discourse on a genocide, while truth wins only with the defeat of denial.
Henry Theriault
Yorum Gönder
Not: Yalnızca bu blogun üyesi yorum gönderebilir.