On Jan. 11, when Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu
marched alongside world leaders in Paris to honor the victims of the Charlie
Hebdo attacks, back in Turkey, members of the Aczimendi religious order
performed funereal prayers to honor the perpetrators of the attacks. Other religious
groups tweeted public invitations to prayer sessions for the perpetrators.
Referred to as the “Kouachi brothers,” these men were not terrorists in the
eyes of several religious sects in Turkey.
(A demonstrator holds a banner as others wave Turkish and Islamic flags during a protest against Cumhuriyet, a staunchly secular opposition newspaper that had re-published Charlie Hebdo cartoons, in Istanbul, Jan. 15, 2015. (photo by REUTERS/Murad Sezer)
Summary⎙ Print Turks have taken to social
media to criticize or applaud their government's reaction to the Charlie Hebdo
attacks in Paris, though some individuals have threatened a Turkish newspaper
with violence after its publication of Charlie Hebdo cartoons.
Author Pinar TremblayPosted January 16, 2015
Indeed, in the Justice and Development Party (AKP)
municipality of Tatvan in Bitlis province, a billboard was posted, reading:
“May peace be upon the Kouachi brothers who sought the revenge of Prophet. When
you [Western world] kill it is called democracy, when we seek revenge [it is
called] terrorism.” Tatvan’s mayor told the media that individuals posted the
sign without the knowledge of his office and it was promptly removed. Yet it
was enough to cause a stir on social media. One tweet read: “A manly statement
from Tatvan. While some are fawning over the French [dogs], Tatvan is standing
tall.” The tweet used #Parismarch as a hashtag, indicating the user's
disapproval of Davutoglu’s participation in the march.
It seems Davutoglu was not able to please any group in
Turkey by attending the Paris solidarity march. AKP parliamentarian Burhan Kuzu
tweeted: “Yesterday’s death toll was 2,000 in Nigeria, 83 in Iraq, 38 in Yemen,
26 in Syria, 16 in Afghanistan and 12 in France. But the whole world spoke only
about the 12 in France.” A Twitter user gave a tongue-in-cheek reply: “Well,
right, then why is Davutoglu not going to Nigeria but France?” Kuzu did not
reply. Davutoglu’s attendance at the rally brought satire to a new level in
Turkish social media. First, a short video appeared showing Davutoglu trying to
make his way to the front row of the march, ever so gently pushing a woman.
Then another video appeared, in which French President Francois Hollande greets
several participants with kisses on both cheeks, but avoids kissing Davutoglu.
Satire masters have dubbed the voice of a famous Turkish comedian over the
clip, saying, “Me, me, now me! Why not me?” as Davutoglu waits in vain.
On the other side of the spectrum is the opposition to
the AKP. Secularists among the opposition struggled to grapple with the reality
that these religious orders and political entities — such as a Twitter account
titled Jabhat al-Nusra in Turkish — could act so boldly in public in a country
where freedom of expression is strictly regulated. One tweeted the prayer
announcement for the Kouachi brothers, adding: “These groups get the courage
from [President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan, who told them 'be offensive.'"
In the Eksisozluk social forum, contributors ridiculed
how pro-AKP pundits — who initially argued that the Charlie Hebdo attack was an
attack on Muslims in Europe in order to provoke global Islamophobia — were now
defending the actions of the Kouachi brothers.
The debate as to why Davutoglu went to Paris was intense
for the pro-AKP pundits. Almost a week after the decision to attend the march,
AKP media were still trying to justify Davutoglu’s decision to appear alongside
Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu in a photo.
The opposition considered Davutoglu’s show of solidarity
with the free world insincere, as well as good material for satire. Meanwhile,
Charlie Hebdo published its first issue after the attack on Jan. 14. The issue
was translated into Turkish and the left-leaning Cumhuriyet daily agreed to
publish it. A small but determined group of individuals protested outside the
newspaper's office, promising revenge and chanting slogans like, “If you are
Charlie, we are Kouachi” and “Kouachi brothers are our pride.” The newspaper’s
editors and two of its seasoned journalists are being investigated for
“provoking public sentiment.”
Davutoglu told the press: “You cannot argue press freedom
if you are publishing material that almost screams come and attack me. We
cannot equate freedom of press with insulting the people.” Promptly, access to
websites that shared the Charlie Hebdo cartoons in Turkish were banned. Turkish
Airlines announced that it would no longer carry Cumhuriyet daily at its
lounges or on flights. As news spread of protests in front of Cumhuriyet and
police raids on the newspaper's printing house, Davutoglu said, in tacit
support of such actions: “In this country, we don’t allow insults to the
Prophet. This is a very clear, sharp and principled stance. Everybody should
know this. This matter has also been explained to the press institutions.”
Social media reactions to the Turkish bans were strong.
“If you [Davutoglu] were going to ban everything related to Charlie Hebdo
magazine, why did you attend the Paris march? And you pushed the woman to make
it to the front row!” ridiculed one user. The Turkish publication Zaytung News
— similar to The Onion — published satirical commentary from Davutoglu: “Let
there be no misunderstanding, I marched for freedom of expression in France!
Free press in France cannot be silenced!”
Pro-AKP pundits and the party's social media army worked
diligently to maintain resistance in face of the difficult events and the
mockery of the opposition. Popular author Ali Cimen observed: “Aiming for a
devout generation, your legacy [referring to Erdogan] will be a bunch of
zombies with no brains using profane language.” Indeed, in an attempt to tackle
the “Je suis Charlie” fervor, a pro-AKP troll @esatreis changed his profile
photo to “Je suis Mohammad” and urged his followers to do the same. His passion
taken a step too far, @esatreis faced harsh criticism and ridicule from devout
Muslims, who said it was offensive to declare oneself the Prophet. Realizing
there was no way out of this one, @esatreis deleted the logo and tweeted:
“Thanks to those who warned that the 'Je suis Mohammad' slogan might be
troublesome, let’s use this one 'Je suis Muslim.'" There was nothing wrong
with the hashtag “Je suis Muslim,” though it's a French-English mismatch. The
original French version, #JeSuisMusulman, has been trending since the first day
of the attack.
“Islamists do not come in one shape, not even the most
radical ones,” a Turkish academic told Al-Monitor. Raised in a secular family,
growing up drinking raki and dating too many girls, the academic went through a
transformation about three decades ago. “The most difficult part is not giving
up alcohol, or partying. The most difficult part of being a devout Muslim in
Turkey is that the people look at you and see a killjoy. And it is a challenge
to even to talk about fun in the midst of so much anger and despair among
Muslims.”
For days leading up to the Jan. 14 publication of the
latest Charlie Hebdo, pro-AKP figures in Turkey were almost on the defensive.
All their attempts to justify the killings were tackled with a deep black humor
of the opposition camp. However, once Cumhuriyet printed a few of the Charlie
Hebdo cartoons, the tide reversed. It now seems that many of the radicalized
sections of Turkey's Islamist crowd are seeking revenge. Unfortunately, threats
of violence — to the extent of publishing journalists' home addresses — is the
only way these groups know how to tackle opposition.
Read more:
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/01/turkey-france-charlie-hebdo-humor-turkish-islamist.html##ixzz3P4KXdjp7

Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder
Not: Yalnızca bu blogun üyesi yorum gönderebilir.